Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:41:27 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAS_CONFIGURE error? Message-ID: <200504261941.35335@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200504261931.40466@harrymail> References: <200504261931.40466@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1491332.itTqWARyfK
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 19:31 schrieb Emanuel Strobl:
> Hello, from the Mk/bsd.port.mk I read:
>
> # CONFIGURE_ARGS
> # - Pass these args to configure if ${HAS_CONFIGURE} is set.
> # Default: "--prefix=3D${PREFIX} ${CONFIGURE_TARGET}" if
> # GNU_CONFIGURE is set, "CC=3D${CC} CCFLAGS=3D${CFLAGS}
> # PREFIX=3D${PREFIX} INSTALLPRIVLIB=3D${PREFIX}/lib
> # INSTALLARCHLIB=3D${PREFIX}/lib" if PERL_CONFIGURE is se=
t,
> # empty otherwise.
>
> The first sentence isn't true on 5.4-RC3. If I define HAS_CONFIGURE=3Dyes
> without CONFIGURE_ENV=3D--prefix=3D${PREFIX} the configure script doesn't=
get
> --prefix set right.
Of course I meant the second sentence and CONFIGURE_ARGS, not the first and=
=20
CONFIGURE_ENV! Sorry!
> Is the description outdated or is this behaviour not intended?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Harry
--nextPart1491332.itTqWARyfK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCbn1PBylq0S4AzzwRAlHoAJ9sw7PAPyuduEWpQFuiNQk92+bYsgCfc+kr
kbstB8Tkeln1FKQ0oPb8mns=
=zIjS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1491332.itTqWARyfK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504261941.35335>