Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 05:51:59 -0500 From: ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> To: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul Message-ID: <201208190551.59457.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ5UdcNkN1FYmP7N9mON6=nkw-Su7q=-rReJZ9i9Kwr5jAgH-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com> <CAJ5UdcNkN1FYmP7N9mON6=nkw-Su7q=-rReJZ9i9Kwr5jAgH-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like > > nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download, > > please? > > > > > > > > portaudit -Fda > > auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps > > New database installed. > > Database created: Sat Aug 18 18:15:04 CDT 2012 > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > > Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/dbf338d0-dce5-11e1- > > b655-14dae9ebcf89.html > > > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > > Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bfecf7c1- > > af47-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html > > > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > > Reference: > > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/380e8c56-8e32-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html > > > > 3 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > > > > You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) > > immediately. Mitja > > -------- > > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I was wanting to ask this question for a long time, but you have > beaten me to it :) I was going to ask specifically if firefox does > depend on libxul that it is necessary? Otherwise, why do we have to > see this every time we update our ports? I have seen that there's a > configuration option for libxul so that it can install, but using > portmaster the option is not the same or not present? > > Anyone want to take a shot at explaining this never ending libxul-* saga? > > Regards, > > > Antonio I think Firefox doesn't depend but I installled VLC player and VLC Mozilla plugins needs libxul. I used beforeMplayer and Gecko plgins which need libxul too and because that I switched to VLC because I thought that I am "free" of libxul but no. Mitja -------- http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208190551.59457.lumiwa>