Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:48:10 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion/CVS experiment summary Message-ID: <20040213114810.GG7404@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040212164236.D96890@ganymede.hub.org> References: <200402091130.05656.craig@tobuj.gank.org> <20040209185105.O72949@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040212164236.D96890@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# scrappy@hub.org / 2004-02-12 16:48:25 -0400:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > first, this seems to be a good analysis of SVN and a good
> > starting point for thinking about moving away from CVS.
>
> I missed the original thread here, so this point may have already been
> made ... but ... we tried to use subversion for a project recently, and
> made a *big* mistake of upgrading to a newer version from what we started
> with ... and could no longer access the repository ... apparently there is
> a 'dump / reload' procedure that we weren't aware of at the time, but this
> is something that should be watched for ...
dump/reload cycles required by a new version from time to time are
announced prominently.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040213114810.GG7404>