Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:23:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216316] objcopy in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10 Message-ID: <bug-216316-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216316 Bug ID: 216316 Summary: objcopy in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10 Product: Base System Version: 11.0-STABLE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: bin Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: pete@twisted.org.uk I run an iscsi setup booting using ixpe, which I build on the FreeBSD server. the last few steps of the build do this: objcopy -O binary -R .zinfo bin/ipxe.pxe.tmp bin/ipxe.pxe.bin objcopy -O binary -j .zinfo bin/ipxe.pxe.tmp bin/ipxe.pxe.zinfo This runs fine on 10-STABLE, but on 11-STABLE I get these warnings from the first command: objcopy: moving loadable section .bss.data16, is this intentional? objcopy: moving loadable section .bss.textdata, is this intentional? the resulting .bin file is not then useable and the build fails. If I copy over the objcopy from 10 and run that instead manually then it succeeds. If use use the version installed from ports it also succeeds. I dont belive ipxe is using objcopy wrongly from reading the manual. Have been looking at the svn logs for the objcopy, and the thing which stands out is the PIE support stuff, but from my reading that has been reverted ? This puzzles me... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216316-8>