Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:51:30 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> To: Sh4d03 <mlists@shadow-security.net> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reasonable settings for greyexp and whiteexp Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0709110948290.28954@glacier.reedmedia.net> In-Reply-To: <46E6A965.5070200@shadow-security.net> References: <46E62975.7040707@shadow-security.net> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0709110751090.28954@glacier.reedmedia.net> <46E6A965.5070200@shadow-security.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Sh4d03 wrote: > I'll keep an eye on things and see if all is ok. I'm still concerned that > there are too many legit senders not being whitelisted. Some mail services use different hosts (different IPs) to retry queued email. You may want to show us a specific example of one that doesn't work. > Also, after a change to the flags in rc.conf is > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/obspamd restart sufficient for the changes to take > effect or must I do a killall -HUP? The rc.d script with restart would be fine. (spamd doesn't listen to HUP signal.) Jeremy C. Reed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.4.64.0709110948290.28954>