Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:38:37 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
To:        shildreth@allantgroup.com
Cc:        FreeBSD Emulation <emulation@freebsd.org>, gkovesdan@t-hosting.hu
Subject:   Re: I am trying to compile under linux compat
Message-ID:  <44F6055D.6080409@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1156973617.54794.100.camel@scotth.emsphone.com>
References:  <1156957083.54794.75.camel@scotth.emsphone.com>	<68109618@srv.sem.ipt.ru>	<1156967569.54794.92.camel@scotth.emsphone.com>	<91304074@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <1156973617.54794.100.camel@scotth.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 01:10 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:52:49 -0500 Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 23:37 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:58:03 -0500 Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> I didn't install linux-devtools, since everything is supposed to be in
>>>>> fc4 port, right?
>>>>>           
>>>> Linux_base port is not supposed to install _everithing_ but to install
>>>> the stuff to support running linux ports under FreeBSD OS.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> There isn't a linux gcc installed, do I need get it from another
>>>>> port? 
>>>>>           
>>>> You may consider using linux_dist-gentoo* for a development needs.
>>>>         
>>>   Would I install that over - in conjunction with the fc4?
>>>       
>> I think yes, but definitely the maintainer of linux_dist-gentoo* ports
>> (CCed) knows better.
>>
>>     
>
>  Well, I went ahead and installed it.  Unless WITH_LINUXBASE is set, it 
>  installs into /usr/local/gentoo-stage1.  To run progs or compile, you 
>  have to do a 'chroot /usr/local/gentoo-stage1'.  Which is not optimal
>  if I want to run something compiled there as in /usr/compat/linux.  I 
>  am going to try to make it the linux_base and see how things run. 
>  Just curious, if linux_base-fc4 is going to be the default, why not 
>  make a linux-devtools port that coincides with the linux_base port?
>
>                               
>   
I'd suggest stage3 instead of stage1 since it is the most complete 
version. WITH_LINUXBASE is okay, if you don't want to chroot, but that 
is discouraged, since _none_ of the related ports are guaranteed to work 
properly with that. Only the default linux_base port is supported 
officially by our ports collection, which is already linux_base-fc4 at 
the moment, that's why I did not mention this way in my previous answer.

-- 
Cheers,

Gabor




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44F6055D.6080409>