Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:10:18 -0500 (EST) From: Bryan Liesner <bleez@verizon.net> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: Bryan Liesner <bleez@verizon.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: follow up on acpi issue Message-ID: <20030127175956.N59961@gravy.kishka.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301271234490.86330-100000@root.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0301271234490.86330-100000@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote: > > Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the > > kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a > > second look and found I still had viapm and its requirements still in > > the config file. The system boots fine now with acpi. > > > > By the way, the system didn't hang as I claimed in my earlier mail. I > > was able to telnet in... Having acpi and viapm had the side effect of > > making the console go away. > > viapm is VIA power management, not an apm system. It's interesting that > it made your console go away. I'm sending this back to -current to see if > anyone has ideas what might be wrong with viapm. I had viapm and its requirements (iicbus, iicsmb) compiled in to my 4.7 kernel so that I could use mbmon to monitor temperatures, etc. Mbmon works just fine without it on 5.0 (a benefit of acpi??). -- ========================================================== = Bryan D. Liesner LeezSoft Communications, Inc. = = A subsidiary of LeezSoft Inc. = = bleez@verizon.net Home of the Gipper = ========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030127175956.N59961>