Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:54:13 +0200 From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> Cc: developers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: The FreeBSD core team needs your help Message-ID: <20010601175413.789e5313.steveo@eircom.net> In-Reply-To: <20010601134157.A8251@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20010601134157.A8251@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:41:57 +0930
Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
GL> When a request or question is sent to core@ you reply with an
Could you stick some numbers in here please. How much email does
core@ get ? What percentage of it (roughly) is handled immediately ?
Order of magnitude thumb in the air numbers will do, just indicate the
confidence level.
GL> It is also your responsibility to prepare a summary of core@'s
GL> businnes once per month and after cores approval of the text, to
Based on the aforementioned email or is there more 'input' ? If
so roughly how much ?
GL> take full advantage off. The benefits include: Lots and lots of
GL> email. birth control (you wont have time to spend with your SO),
GL> sunburn protection (you wont have time to spend away from the
GL> computer).
<grin> I already have most of these benefits, a little more is
probably OK.
GL> example, or appointed?). If you're interested, it's your choice
GL> whether you copy -developers, though personally I'd prefer if you just
GL> replied to core@.
I think others may be interested in the answers to these questions
hence the crosspost, my apologies to any it annoys.
--
Many have tried to formulate rules for software development, we
are guided by the ways in which they fail to work.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010601175413.789e5313.steveo>