Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:40:13 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.8 v/s 5.1 Message-ID: <87he2vmzea.fsf@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> (Bryan Cassidy's message of "Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:51:57 -0500") References: <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-09-29T07:51:57Z, Bryan Cassidy <b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> writes: > which is better for whatever reasons people use it. Define "better" - I'm not being facetious. If by "better" you mean "faster on common hardware and more stable", then you *probably* want 4.x. If you mean "has cool new features and should be faster on high-end hardware", then you *probably* want 5.x. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/eERS5sRg+Y0CpvERAh8CAJ95OAl6khDg9QoRSkWTyUzVq+5J3QCfa94m 7RTsN36oV8oWWd/RCQwd0Ew= =8BgM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87he2vmzea.fsf>