Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 20:50:30 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -stable vs -current (was Re: solid NFS patch #6... ) Message-ID: <19990430205030.A94231@mad> In-Reply-To: <199904302352.QAA41119@apollo.backplane.com>; from Matthew Dillon on Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:52:58PM -0700 References: <199904302208.RAA07422@home.dragondata.com> <199904302352.QAA41119@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:52:58PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I expect the 3.2 release to be a really good release. I seem to recall that 2.2.x wasn't even called "-stable" until 2.2.2. That .2 release is exactly where 3.x is right now... -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990430205030.A94231>