Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:38:35 -0800 From: "Freddie Cash" <fcash@bigfoot.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 2.2.x.vs 2.2-stable Message-ID: <199901150238.SAA14474@ocis.ocis.net> In-Reply-To: <79022.916362952@gjp.erols.com> References: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:56:38 %2B1100." <D0D9AB571768D211AA150008C74CF8E4027B58@MERCURY>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > FreeBSD 2.0 was not tested. We strongly suggest upgrading your servers to > 2.2.8, preferably 2.2-stable. What's the difference between 2.2.x and 2.2-stable? I'm guessing 2.2-stable is better? Freddie <anxiously awaiting 2.2.8 CD> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 5.5.5 -- QDPGP 2.12 Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html iQA/AwUBNp6qKv1GU6dOoWY/EQLGQwCfRBnk36ZjxN9X9bScY2IvAj18JfUAoJEW Ux/gWDLWZB3T5C4wsOaVxhLi =H25s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901150238.SAA14474>