Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:43:04 +0100 From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ? Message-ID: <493EE416-62CE-4EA4-81A7-8F802789D5DD@lassitu.de> In-Reply-To: <200910281112.06300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <E1N2NcA-0004c4-CE@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <200910271902.19618.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20091027104316.dsp7kikkoogo80gw@www.goldsword.com> <200910281112.06300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 28.10.2009 um 01:41 schrieb Daniel O'Connor: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, jfarmer@goldsword.com wrote: >> Check the archives for stable@ and fs@. I believe that there was a =20= >> thread not that long ago detailing exactly how to do that. IIRC, =20 >> while it took a bit of work, it wasn't difficult. >=20 > Hmm do you have any idea what the subject was? I'm having trouble=20 > finding it :( If you still need it, it was "ZFS pool corrupted on upgrade of -current = (probably sata renaming)" on -current back in July. You probably need = to read the full thread, and there are some caveats, but it's sometimes = possible to glabel each device/partion, and zpool replace the original = device/partition with the labelled one online. HTH, STefan --=20 Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Fon +49 151 14070811
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?493EE416-62CE-4EA4-81A7-8F802789D5DD>