Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:51:40 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> To: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does "makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" actually work? Message-ID: <20100416155140.21425jmdvmha7z40@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20100414183540.GA2542@gypsy> References: <g2md04e16b71004140133ubee176eboe6baaeb7ef0f0605@mail.gmail.com> <20100414105819.13143mf12ccgjy4g@webmail.leidinger.net> <y2vd04e16b71004140231u4b638141w17215bf037a9c94@mail.gmail.com> <20100414132342.74616nl7805cljgo@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100414183540.GA2542@gypsy>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> (from Wed, 14 Apr 2010  
11:35:40 -0700):
> Have you or anyone else ever used buildkernel successfully with
> "makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" in the conf file?  Something as simple as
> this does not work for me:
Copy&paste patch, tabs probbly mangled:
---snip---
Index: Makefile.inc1
===================================================================
--- Makefile.inc1       (revision 206700)
+++ Makefile.inc1       (working copy)
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@
  .endif
  # kernel stage
-KMAKEENV=      ${WMAKEENV}
+KMAKEENV=      ${WMAKEENV:NNO_CTF=1}
  KMAKE=         ${KMAKEENV} ${MAKE} KERNEL=${INSTKERNNAME}
  #
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@
         @echo "--------------------------------------------------------------"
         cd ${KRNLOBJDIR}/${_kernel}; \
             MAKESRCPATH=${KERNSRCDIR}/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm \
-           ${MAKE} SSP_CFLAGS= -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS -DNO_CTF \
+           ${MAKE} SSP_CFLAGS= -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS \
             -f ${KERNSRCDIR}/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile
  # XXX - Gratuitously builds aicasm in the ``makeoptions NO_MODULES'' case.
  .if !defined(MODULES_WITH_WORLD) && !defined(NO_MODULES) &&  
exists(${KERNSRCDIR}/modules)
---snip---
This lets the buildkernel generate ctf info in the object files (the  
build is not finished yet, so I still have to verify that the final  
kernel contains them too, but I do not see a reason ATM why this  
should not be the case).
If your build environment is faster (here: about an hour for the  
buildkernel), can you please help testing? A buildworld with and  
without WITH_CTF in src.conf, and for buildkernel the same (with and  
without WITH_CTF in src.conf, and for each with and without  
makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes in the kernel). The expected outcome is no  
CTF when no WITH_CTF is in src.conf (except for the buildkernel with  
the makeoptions), and always with CTF when WITH_CTF is in src.conf  
(alternatively only CTF if makeoptions is used, but this would be  
surprising for me).
And then... NO_CTF=yes defined in src.conf and WITH_CTF too... for the  
world this should not produce CTF data, but for the kernel I'm not  
sure what will or should happen for the makeoptions case...
Bye,
Alexander.
-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net  Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org     netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
See, these two penguins walked into a bar, which was really stupid, 'cause
the second one should have seen it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100416155140.21425jmdvmha7z40>
