Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 18:21:48 PDT From: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com> To: Jamie Bowden <bowden@cs.odu.edu> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, Craig Shaver <craig@progroup.com> Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES Message-ID: <9607210121.AA09080@gnu.mc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 20 Jul 1996 11:35:41 PDT." <Pine.3.91.960720143207.642C-100000@zaxxon.cs.odu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.3.91.960720143207.642C-100000@zaxxon.cs.odu.edu>, you write: >On Sat, 20 Jul 1996, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > >> > NT is not a bad OS, it's not >> >my prefered OS. It reminds me of NeXT in serious way : better hope your >> >GUI doesn't ever get screwed, cause if it does, so do you. > >> Well, I've had XFree86 crash or hang my NetBSD machine more than once, >> so I guess that goes for a lot of systems... ;-) When you say "crash" does the machine panic? If X hangs up, you can usually kill it off an rsh or on another virtual console... marty
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9607210121.AA09080>