Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 19:00:51 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su> To: James Raftery <james@kerna.ie> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jails update Message-ID: <20030306120051.GA13495@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <20030306111414.GB95910@bender.kerna.ie> References: <m3znoa8543.fsf@teg.local> <20030305135652.GA83413@ei.bzerk.org> <m3u1ehuc9w.fsf@teg.local> <020c01c2e340$ee8f5c60$19fd2fd8@westbend.net> <m31y1l1xcz.fsf@teg.local> <20030306140038.M43664@woozle.rinet.ru> <20030306111414.GB95910@bender.kerna.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:14:14AM +0000, James Raftery wrote: > > We avoid this (and the whole need to update multiple jails) by > > installing to dedicated partition and the do multiple read-only null > > mounts, so each jail has perfectly equal read-only /usr (with symlinks > > outside to /home, /local, etc) > The rather blunt warning in the BUGS sections of the mount_null man > page[0] had put me off using it. How stable is nullfs these days? > [0] ``... NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) ...'' It wass pretty stable for me. I did buildworld on it. Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030306120051.GA13495>