Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:45:33 +0100
From:      Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Cc:        demon@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin - why is it marked as broken on 8?
Message-ID:  <ef8c8a881001150645kb0cc5fcpc37de51e77f72316@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100115001412.138ed882@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <ef8c8a881001141542n7d706477sf9c2258ead2c70c7@mail.gmail.com> <4B4FB10D.5040905@FreeBSD.org> <20100115001412.138ed882@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500
> Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>
> > The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by
> > pointyhat (FreeBSD package building cluster):
> >
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-netload-plugin/Makefile#rev1.28
> >
> > In fact, pav@ included the specific compiler error.  I wonder if there
> > was possibly a bug in the early 8.0 OS at that time (13 Jun 2009) that
> > caused the build failure.
> >
> > If you are able to build and run successfully under 8.0 now, I suggest
> > filing a PR with a patch to unbreak the port.
>
> I just tried it and it failed  on 8.0 (RELENGE_8_0), the OP is using
> 8-stable.
>

Well, shouldn't the port only be marked broken for RELENG_8_0 (and perhaps
-CURRENT) then, and not for RELENG_8?
I don't know how to do that, or I would file a PR.
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef8c8a881001150645kb0cc5fcpc37de51e77f72316>