Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:13:06 -0500 From: Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: drosih@rpi.edu, deatley@apple.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __P macro question Message-ID: <20020131081306.A8666@hda.hda.com> In-Reply-To: <20020130.145424.00452635.imp@village.org>; from imp@village.org on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:54:24PM -0700 References: <FD5651F8-1537-11D6-993F-003065766C3C@apple.com> <p05101218b87df1cb2d6a@[128.113.24.47]> <20020130.145424.00452635.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:54:24PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I've yet to see a compelling argument against me doing this. You have > until Friday to make a compelling case. The time has come for this > change. bin gets committed this weekend. I'll post diffs on Friday > and commit Sunday/Monday. So far, no one has replied to my other mail > that threatened to do this, so I'm taking that as agreement. > > Comments? I think an initial commit pass done strictly by a script, even if it has some drawbacks, could help reduce diffs against the other BSDs as they could use the same script. Peter PS: I'm sure I do more embedded work than most others, and actively support "64K split I&D" microcontrollers and DSP architectures. I share "Terry's problem", I don't share "Terry's solution". This process is long overdue, anyone wishing to know more details of my opinion should do a google search for discussions we had six years ago. -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime development, Machine control, HD Associates, Inc. Fail-Safe systems, Agency approval To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020131081306.A8666>