Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 08:17:29 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, ahasty@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, roger@cs.strath.ac.uk Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci brooktree848.c Message-ID: <199805201517.IAA09854@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 May 1998 23:35:59 %2B1000." <199805201335.XAA09144@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I disagree . Again a single uniform interface is not a bad thing also it paves the way for a single application to manage the tree;additionally, sysctl could be cmd line interface and graphic sysctl could manage the entire tree. Amancio > >> It sure will be nice to have a uniform way to configure the kernel and its > >> modules ala sysctl rather than having to remember N "hairy device specific" > >> programs. > > > >There is that, Bruce. Are you really arguing that it's more natural > >to have a ccdcontrol and a pppcontrol and a rndcontrol and a > >foocontrol and a ... than it is to have a handful of sysctl variables? > > No, I'm arguing that it is more natural to have a ccdcontrol and etc. > than it it is to have a ccd sysctl and a ppp sysctl and a rnd sysctl > and a foo sysctl and a ..., each with its own more than a handful of > sub-variables, each with its own kludges to handle multiple units and > each with its own kludges to recover device attributes. > > Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805201517.IAA09854>