Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:19:21 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred.perlstein@gmail.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <alfred.perlstein@gmail.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: libxo: bringing it in for netstat Message-ID: <3550F793-285E-4012-ABD3-7C55143A6AA4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6F2B71D4-5187-4A94-A345-431CE1E64880@xcllnt.net> References: <28345BB7-0079-433C-9AB6-89453B5250B3@gmail.com> <6F2B71D4-5187-4A94-A345-431CE1E64880@xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 26, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >=20 >> On Jan 26, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Alfred Perlstein = <alfred.perlstein@gmail.com> wrote: >>=20 >> Folks, >>=20 >> I have a huge number of commitments at work which will keep me from = having the time to finish up my libxo netstat work. Or in fact most = anything FreeBSD for the upcoming few weeks or months even. >>=20 >> I actually believe that the netstat port to libxo is ready for = inclusion (almost) but in case there are bugs I would likely not be = responsive enough to keep a angry mob from forming. >=20 > You said almost: what=92s missing? As far as I know nothing right now. I am just worried as the program is = setgid kmem and although libxo is awesome I caught some formatting = errors that upset it and cause it to crash during development. so it = should be audited imo. Otherwise I'd commit it now if I had time to deal with any bug blowback. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3550F793-285E-4012-ABD3-7C55143A6AA4>