Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 10:42:46 -0700 (PDT) From: sos@FreeBSD.ORG To: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, rcarter@pinyon.org Subject: Re: opt_linux.h, opt_nfs.h, and friends Message-ID: <199807011742.KAA20610@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <199807011634.MAA04510@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from Daniel Eischen at "Jul 1, 98 12:34:44 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Daniel Eischen who wrote:
> > My make buildworld this morning ~6:30AM MST fails in lkm/linux
> > looking for an opt_linux.h. Touching the file in the
> > obj hierarchy gets through lkm/linux but then the build
> > fails looking for opt_nfs.h and couple of others (going
> > from memory, which erodes yearly...).
> >
> > Now I just re-cvsupped all my sources last night, but this
> > is only a couple of day old -current. Not seeing any
> > complaints in current or fixes in cvs-all makes me
> > suspect something on my side. What am I missing?
>
> I got the same thing from a CVSup on 6/30/98(last night).
> I re-CVSup'd this morning, and will try again later, but
> you're not alone.
I think Bruce has just fixed those bogons...
This is the X'd time lately that current has been broken for days.
I can accept that there can be runtime erros/bugs in new code, its
very difficult to check for all situation s given maybe only one
machine to test it on.
BUT, there is absolutely NO excuse for committing code that
wont even compile..
Maybe we need to reconsider the whole commiters/access scenario...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Soren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team
So much code to hack -- so little time.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807011742.KAA20610>