Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 10:42:42 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the truth? (sycalls and traps) (fwd) Message-ID: <99Nov29.103530est.40344@border.alcanet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911281412510.544-100000@current1.whistle.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911281412510.544-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1999-Nov-29 09:28:00 +1100, Julian Elischer wrote: >(If the UTS is running then we just block the entire process) This could easily become a bottleneck on a large SMP system. I don't believe the kernel scheduler should need to obtain an SMP lock for its entire execution. Requiring this for a UTS sounds like a performance hit. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?99Nov29.103530est.40344>