Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:11:32 -0400 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Recursive nullfs mounts and r224655 Message-ID: <CAGFTUwPHLa-Lq6kQh6Q_efVd2XARHd-W_gnW-bnN-hd_9ZLCQg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110806144325.GE17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <CAGFTUwN9-m0Ts-1NSjPFMTGHGDuH64nOrGFmBZgEAk3_wXLqWA@mail.gmail.com> <20110806144325.GE17489@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/6/11, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:44:25AM -0400, b. f. wrote:
>> Recent changes to the kernel (sys/kern/vfs_mount.c, in r224655?)
>> between r224550 and r224655 have broken my tinderbox setup. It had a
>> tmpfs filesystem mounted at /T and a UFS filesystem mounted at /U,
>> and, when setting up the tinderbox, performed:
>>
>> mkdir /U/u1
>> mkdir /U/u2
>> mkdir /T/t1
>> mount -t nullfs /T/t1 /U/u1
>> mkdir-p /U/u1/u3/u4
>> mount -t nullfs /U/u2 /U/u1/u3/u4
>> ...
>>
>> This worked at r224550 and before. It now fails at the second nullfs
>> mount, with ENOENT("mount_nullfs: No such file or directory").
> r224615 and r224655 must be reverted.
>
> The reason for your trouble is that nullfs cannot cache any vnodes,
> thus reclaiming anything that get reference count of 0. This interacts
> badly with VOP_VNTOCNP() which has to operate on the vnodes with
> zero refcount, since we cannot decrement refcount under the namecache
> lock.
>
> Trying to update vptocnp(9) interface is too intrusive change for freeze
> period.
>
Thank you for the analysis, it will make fixing this problem locally a
bit easier, while you sort it out. Does 224614 have a bearing on this
problem, as well as 224615?
b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFTUwPHLa-Lq6kQh6Q_efVd2XARHd-W_gnW-bnN-hd_9ZLCQg>