Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:36:46 -0800 From: Mark Atkinson <atkin901@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0RC2 amd64 - kernel panic running make buildworld Message-ID: <hcsvlv$ds2$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <hcsslt$3ie$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20091031231545.493cee89@boiler.free.de> <867hu6gvou.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20091104163621.36943807@orwell.free.de> <hcss08$p3$1@ger.gmane.org> <hcsslt$3ie$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Atkinson wrote: > Mark Atkinson wrote: >> Kai Gallasch wrote: >>> Am Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:24:01 +0100 >>> schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>: >>> >>>> Kai Gallasch <gallasch@free.de> writes: >>>>> I installed 8.0RC2-amd64 on an 8-core opteron server a few days ago. >>>>> >>>>> When I try to do a make buildworld or make buildkernel the server >>>>> reboots without any message left in the logs. The same happens >>>>> when building bigger ports (for example ruby18 or perl58) >>>> Could it be related to this? What's your CPUID? >>> Found this in dmesg. Is this the CPUID? "Id = 0x100f23" >> That's generation 16 (0xf) model 2, stepping 3. This errata apparently >> only effects gen 15 (0xe) and some pre-release -- never released to >> public (0xf). I have the same processor in my system btw. > > sorry for the double wrong posting. I see several webpages refer to 15 > as f and 16 as f. usr/ports/misc/cpuid refers to it as 15. > > The pages referenced via the bugzilla entry in the commit refer to it as > 0xf but between 32 and 63. Does the model 2 correctly put us in the > range in the commit 0x20 and 0x3f? (i.e. stepping is included?) I'll answer my own question, no: http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/25481.pdf Although the some of the posts in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11305 indicate any model < 0x40. Someone must have actually narrowed the range.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hcsvlv$ds2$1>