Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:19:08 -0800 (PST) From: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Jim Durham <jimd@nepinc.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4? Message-ID: <20011205085750.I28101-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> In-Reply-To: <20011205115102.E63148@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FWIW, I'd vote for "MFS"ing the TCP changes in -STABLE to RELENG_4_4. As it stands right now 4.4 is kinda broken. On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Jim Durham <jimd@nepinc.com> writes: > > Duh... right. OGS..(Old Guy Syndrome). I actually just did a cvsup to > > RELENG_4_4 and it didn't have the fixes. I guess I'll rephrase my > > question... "Can we have the patches in REGENG_4_4?". > > RELENG_4_4 is for security fixes only. Consider using -STABLE if you > require additional improvements. > > Best regards, > Mike Barcroft > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011205085750.I28101-100000>