Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:42:07 +0300 From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: javavmwrapper - JVM order question Message-ID: <201005281742.07172.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <F56E643D3EB3437C96AEFE03374AA799@nb1>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
i would say, just call directly your java executable. i agree at first glance the javavmwrapper - bsd.java.mk combination is a mess, yielding funny results. Στις Friday 28 May 2010 16:39:32 ο/η Miloň Papežík έγραψε: > Hi, > > I have problem/question regarding the order of JVMs determined by > javavmwrapper > when no JAVA* environment variables are set. > > When I do not have installed ports, the javavmwrapper determines the JVM > according to /usr/local/etc/javavms. > However when the ports are installed, the order is determined according to > /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk. > > The problem is that each scenario gives different result. > > I would expect the javavmwrapper to be consistent - to use always > /usr/local/etc/javavms > and use bsd.java.mk as fallback when /usr/local/etc/javavms is not > available. > > Should we change/fix javavmwrapper? > What do you think? > > Thank you in advance, > Milon -- Achilleas Mantzioshome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201005281742.07172.achill>