Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:51:59 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Doug Brewer <brewer.doug@gmail.com> Cc: arm@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Message-ID: <CAGH67wTK4iWN2-5kzxwZq1t=-VysSa4SA4cPMOYV-rvXiy73sQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAG0V13TpALMdPG-8rifcjjROXZ948mQzjnn1YvqZ4TEyBJz5vQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201211082303.qA8N3RlN031977@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <CAJ-VmomK5CYA2=Jmd73pMqP1kHoxvwZydCg=AKCc12tsif9XYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG0V13TpALMdPG-8rifcjjROXZ948mQzjnn1YvqZ4TEyBJz5vQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Doug Brewer <brewer.doug@gmail.com> wrote: > No offence, but how many times did you break the build? Could you please > compile your code before committing next time? Thanks a lot! > make tinderbox is the important point here because it uses different compile time options and flags that Adrian doesn't probably have set in his KERNCONF -- assuming that the default KERNCONFs haven't been mangled on his system, in which case it messes up this statement; [un]fortunately someone can change GENERIC, etc on his/her box, run make tinderbox and have it pass, then . In which case I would recommend the following [just to be safe]: 1. Custom KERNCONF that includes a generic one. 2. make tinderbox -DMAKE_JUST_KERNELS before performing commits with just ARM/x86 and a select KERNCONF as a smoke test, and a more extensive make tinderbox when doing a more major commit. Thoughts? Thanks! -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wTK4iWN2-5kzxwZq1t=-VysSa4SA4cPMOYV-rvXiy73sQ>