Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 19:14:35 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, Yevgeniy Aleynikov <eugenea@infospace.com>, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@mckusick.com, Ken Pizzini <kenp@infospace.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patch #3 (was Re: bleh. Re: ufs_rename panic) Message-ID: <20011003021435.0EE48380A@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200110022312.f92NCpp60948@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Dillon wrote: > Here is the latest patch I have. It appears to completely solve the > problem. I have shims in unionfs and nfs for the moment. This seems rather large compared to Ian Dowse's version.. Are you sure that you're doing this the right way? Adding a whole new locking mechanism when the simple VRENAME flag to be enough seems like a bit of overkill.. I'm not criticizing your work, I am just wondering if you have considered Ian's work and feel that it is wrong or the wrong direction.. His certainly appears more elegant than yours so I want to understand why you feel yours is better than his. freebsd-hackers Message-id: <200110022152.aa36964@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011003021435.0EE48380A>