Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 15:17:18 -0500 From: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: quel@quelrod.net Subject: Re: usb 2.0 dell inspirion 8500 Message-ID: <16356.44622.40229.222367@canoe.dclg.ca> In-Reply-To: <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211044430.27469@quelrod.net> <20031121200702.GD74178@cicely12.cicely.de> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211509070.32752@quelrod.net> <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes: Bernd> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, quel@quelrod.net Bernd> wrote: >> Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then? Bernd> It is intentionally not in GENERIC. For those of us not in the know on this, where does ehci stand? Ehci recognises my controller when I put it in the kernel, but it halts whenever I connect a USB 2.0 device. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16356.44622.40229.222367>