Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209191610280.7723@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <k3d8td$4mq$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172115020.26215@wonkity.com> <k3d8td$4mq$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >> For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with >> local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the >> ports tree. > > PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and portsnap for > ports? That's another way. If there are any local changes to the ports tree, portsnap will overwrite them. I also find portsnap slower than either csup or svn.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1209191610280.7723>