Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:38:35 +0100 From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk> To: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" <ugen@latte.worldbank.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.mt.net> Subject: Re: Firewalling one interface using IPFW? Message-ID: <1101.811640315@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:28:31 PDT." <Chameleon.4.00.4.950920162930.ugen@ugen>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Chameleon.4.00.4.950920162930.ugen@ugen>, "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" wr ites: >As far as i remember my own code( heh, i already forgot it for good).. >you have option "via" or "at" which both allow to set all the firewalls >for one interface only. Other interfaces would not be affected by the >permissions... Speaking as someone currently working on improving the ipfw docs - ``via'' does allow you to tie rules to packets from a specific interface. Hope this helps :-) Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1101.811640315>