Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 08:45:48 +0000 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: Devin Butterfield <dbutter@wireless.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: name for sys/ Message-ID: <20010102084548.L47732@hand.dotat.at> In-Reply-To: <3A5145CC.5EEE71CE@wireless.net> References: <20010101174554.A29489@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A5145CC.5EEE71CE@wireless.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Devin Butterfield <dbutter@wireless.net> wrote: >David O'Brien wrote: >> >> I am back to wondering what to call this beast. I don't think we should >> carry forward `arm32' if it is an artificial name. > >I would agree with David that `strongarm' would be the better choice >since there is no question regarding what's supported. ARM Ltd define various versions of the instruction set (I think the most recent version is v5T and the StrongARM is v4) so I suggest something like arm4. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch fanf@covalent.net dot@dotat.at "Because all you of Earth are idiots!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010102084548.L47732>