Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:16:43 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/driconf Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4DB9BD1B.8080400@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201104280857.p3S8vjhp021238@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201104280857.p3S8vjhp021238@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Generally maintainership in a situation like this implies stepping forward to provide hosting for the distfiles. I understand that there are other ports that are referring to debian repos for non-linux things, and I've asked portmgr to look into this practice. Meanwhile, I'm pretty sure that this example is not a good idea. It's fairly rude to utilize the resources of another project without permission. Doug On 04/28/2011 01:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > bapt 2011-04-28 08:57:45 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > graphics/driconf Makefile distinfo > Log: > New volunteer to maintain > Use distfile hosted at debian (this is cheating :)) > undeprecate > > PR: ports/156688 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156688 > Submitted by: Zhihao Yuan<lichray _at_ gmail.com> > > Revision Changes Path > 1.17 +5 -6 ports/graphics/driconf/Makefile > 1.5 +2 -3 ports/graphics/driconf/distinfo > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/driconf/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.16&r2=1.17&f=h > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/driconf/distinfo.diff?&r1=1.4&r2=1.5&f=h > -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DB9BD1B.8080400>