Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:09:09 -0400 From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: "Pete French" <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dreadful gmirror performance, though each half works fine Message-ID: <5f67a8c40804171109o264ad120wa442f21be8a4bb33@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1JmS8Z-000BPO-9x@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> wrote: > I am trying to run a system with a pair of drives mirrored under > gmirror, one of thhem being local and the other remote using ggated. > I have experimented with this rather extensively and have operationally decided not to use ggated in combination with gmirror --- it doesn't appear to work as well as one might expect. Some improvements were made to ggated awhile ago --- to improve error recovery. It should have helped, but didn't. I'm somewhat vaguely wondering if zfs with one local and one ggated disk will work well.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5f67a8c40804171109o264ad120wa442f21be8a4bb33>