Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:16:39 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@korin.warman.org.pl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timed vs. NTP Message-ID: <3375.844265799@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:16:45 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.3.91.961002160847.24317A-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.91.961002160847.24317A-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>, Andr zej Bialecki writes: >Hi, > >I just stumbled across a certain problem: I must use a kind of NTP >between a few FBSD machines (one of them has horribly unstable clock :-( >So I thought the timed would be good for this. But it seems the timed >works only on the same LAN, and my machines are connected through >Internet (several routers between). >Well, I looked for a port of NTP daemon in /ports, but there is none. >Could someone suggest me a way to solve this (I'm prepared even to some >hacking of timed code, if need be...)? man xntpd ? :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3375.844265799>