Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:20:44 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: frank@exit.com Cc: Peter Losher <plosher-keyword-freebsd.a36e57@plosh.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forcing a da* numbering scheme. Message-ID: <43FC814C.5060502@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <1140593123.12244.10.camel@realtime.exit.com> References: <43FC0BE2.8020605@plosh.net> <1140593123.12244.10.camel@realtime.exit.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Frank Mayhar wrote: > bOn Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:59 -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > >>What's the proper method these days for defining a static naming scheme >>for direct access devices (da*)? > > > /boot/device.hints > > hint.scbus.0.at="ahc0" > hint.da.0.at="scbus0" > hint.da.0.target="0" > hint.da.1.at="scbus0" > hint.da.1.target="1" > > hint.scbus.1.at="ahc1" > hint.da.100.at="scbus1" > hint.da.100.target="0" > hint.da.101.at="scbus1" > hint.da.101.target="1" > > etc. The hint scheme for scsi is also documented in /sys/conf/NOTES, as well as the scsi(4) manpage. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43FC814C.5060502>