Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:02:33 -0400
From:      Jerry <freebsd.user@seibercom.net>
To:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Browser choices & flash
Message-ID:  <20100908180233.09ead760@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <19591.30637.289885.767759@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
References:  <201009080945.48847.david@vizion2000.net> <19591.30637.289885.767759@jerusalem.litteratus.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 07:46:53 -0400
Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> articulated:

> David Southwell writes:
> 
> >  One of our freebsd systems is a user terminal with desktop. We
> >  have constant difficulties with web browsing on that
> >  platform. Here is the data
> 
> >  2. PROBLEMS
> >  Frequent crashing of all available browsers - seems to be flash
> > related. 
> >  3. ADVICE PLEASE
> >  Most reliable browser combination and recomendations of specific
> >  port combinations which can deliver reliable browsing including
> >  flash capability.
> 
> 	What "works" for me - doesn't crash, but sometimes can't
> handle the content - is:
> 
> 	firefox-3.6.8 (or)
> 	seamonkey-2.0.6
> 	nspluginwrapper-1.2.2_7
> 	linux-f10-flashplugin-10.1r82
> 
> 	installed per the Handbook.  A minor annoyance is the wrapper
> doesn't exit cleanly and tends to leave hung jobs; not noticeable
> resource sink, until you have 20+ of them ....

The biggest problem with firefox is that FreeBSD does not have a
compatible (current) version of Java available for it. If you don't need
Java, all is well and good; otherwise, you are screwed.

-- 
Jerry ✌
FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100908180233.09ead760>