Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 21:51:28 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: usb 2.0 dell inspirion 8500 Message-ID: <20031220205127.GQ527@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <16356.44622.40229.222367@canoe.dclg.ca> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211044430.27469@quelrod.net> <20031121200702.GD74178@cicely12.cicely.de> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211509070.32752@quelrod.net> <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de> <16356.44622.40229.222367@canoe.dclg.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:17:18PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > >>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes: > > Bernd> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, quel@quelrod.net > Bernd> wrote: > >> Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then? > > Bernd> It is intentionally not in GENERIC. > > For those of us not in the know on this, where does ehci stand? Ehci > recognises my controller when I put it in the kernel, but it halts > whenever I connect a USB 2.0 device. There seems to be compatibility issues with some controllers, but I don't own any of them. Maybe the NetBSD team already did something about this. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031220205127.GQ527>