Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 21:52:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, fenner@parc.xerox.com, peter@netplex.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bogus errno twiddling by lstat... Message-ID: <199806192152.OAA23766@usr08.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199806192112.OAA16187@mango.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Jun 19, 98 02:12:52 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> However, normal library > functions are explicitly allowed to modify errno even if no error > occurs. Allowed to. Should they, however? I think "no". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806192152.OAA23766>