Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 09:51:40 -0800 From: Beech Rintoul <freebsd@freebsdnorth.com> To: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsdnorth.com> Subject: Re: MALLOC_PRODUCTION Message-ID: <4FAAAEAC.1060606@freebsdnorth.com> In-Reply-To: <CAMVU60apPRPiYPd-0w5GbnfsUai2x1NGbk5tCp25r8cn6=bG6A@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FA9AA3B.9080907@freebsdnorth.com> <CAMVU60apPRPiYPd-0w5GbnfsUai2x1NGbk5tCp25r8cn6=bG6A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/8/2012 10:26 PM, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Beech Rintoul <freebsd@freebsdnorth.com> wrote: >> I'm a bit unclear where to define MALLOC_PRODUCTION. does it go in >> make.conf or src.conf? > make.conf. > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/UPDATING?revision=234396&view=markup > Thanks to everyone who replied. Actually, UPDATING is wrong. Since this only affects a system build the proper place to define it is in src.conf. It will work from either make.conf or src.conf, but there's no reason to define it on a ports build. Maybe someone with a src bit can fix that. Beech
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FAAAEAC.1060606>