Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:07:44 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tidy and HTML tab spacing Message-ID: <4F1D93E0.2050709@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201211648030.72083@wonkity.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201181255210.39534@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201181520140.40712@wonkity.com> <4F1B4767.5070105@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1201211648030.72083@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012.01.22. 1:30, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> On 2012.01.18. 23:49, Warren Block wrote: >>> 5. Don't tidy HTML files at all (suggested as an option by Benedict >>> Reuschling). The unprocessed HTML is ugly, but few people are going >>> to look at it directly. Files that haven't been through tidy are a >>> little larger, about 4% in the case of the Porter's Handbook. >> I also think tidy should be removed. As hrs wrote, new standards >> should be evaluated and probably they are much better. (I think they >> are.) If there are some nits, then we should process it with a custom >> script or something, instead of this crapware. > > Tidy does a lot; it would be a lot of work to recreate. Tidy is also the reason that our webpages are not valid HTML. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F1D93E0.2050709>