Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:34:56 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: threads@freebsd.org, "Eugeny N Dzhurinsky" <bofh@redwerk.com> Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... Message-ID: <cb5206420612200234t2e2ba117v519ace182fe28189@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <200612191141.12890.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <20061219094541.GF1006@office.redwerk.com> <200612191151.37416.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <20061219104300.GG1006@office.redwerk.com> <em9h8o$s5d$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061220075801.GA960@office.redwerk.com> <cb5206420612200105o312cea80ub9d45c6c445df305@mail.gmail.com> <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/20/06, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:05:31PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 12/20/06, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:15:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >> Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > >> > looks like I need to map libpthread.so.1 - not libpthread.so.2? > > >> If you're using 5.x, stay away from libthr - it was much slower back > > >then. > > > > > >And it doesn't work well ;) > > Didn't! :) > > I was unable to test it with 6.1 at home, so I'm not sure. Btw, is it possible > to enable libthr for any application in FreeBSD 6.1 somehow, or it is probably > not a good idea? You should test and decide for yourself. It's not a bad idea a priori.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420612200234t2e2ba117v519ace182fe28189>