Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 13:55:53 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.cc> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <3C4C8E69.90DEB78E@mindspring.com> References: <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202344.g0KNijt34738@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3C4BC6A0.4078CBA6@mindspring.com> <20020121140516.GB57549@madman.nectar.cc> <3C4C7EA7.66CBFC0D@mindspring.com> <20020121145914.A91420@hellblazer.nectar.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: > > In the way that the author of the PAM architecture from Sun > > spoke at the Silicon Valley BSD User's Group meeting, > > Do you have a reference, or do we have to guess what you are talking > about? :-) I have my memory of the talk he gave, which included the idea that Sun was not supporting work to modify the PAM architecture to support Kerberos in the future. Basically, you can use it for authentication and password change, but for little else, and even those uses require going through incredible hoops (e.g. abusing the authentication module API to implement a credential cache). Did you need more? Are you really just fishing for Paul Fronberg's email address? Maybe this release note from HP will explain the limitations satisfactorily: http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/J5849-90001/J5849-90001.html NB: This is just for authentication, mostly preauthentication. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C4C8E69.90DEB78E>