Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 15:59:09 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: New kernel option proposed.. Message-ID: <20569.826329549@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Mar 1996 14:15:17 %2B0100." <199603081315.AA09086@Sisyphos>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Documenting these effects of FAILSAVE being defined > is VERY important, or nobody will understand why a > custom kernel fails, when the GENERIC kernel worked. I don't disagree, but where would you suggest doing this? Dropping a multi-line comment into LINT for every possible consumer of FAILSAFE will probably eventually result in a comment-from-hell entry in the LINT file is what I'm afraid of. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20569.826329549>