Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:45:25 -0600 From: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> To: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> Cc: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: TSO test Message-ID: <CAOtMX2g7NzquGC17Gz5dXHEOy7nQFGEhb7FrBPO0zrXDwH=d6g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <CAFOYbcn9XTaLrtZhkS1X69qhf2aOe0iOSirCTA=LfGsZDTqbeg@mail.gmail.com> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Would it be more useful to log the NIC's interrupt rate using "vmstat -i"? On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> wrote: > Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes > with TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same > scenario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] > On Behalf Of Jack Vogel > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM > To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> > Subject: TSO test > > Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit > more distilled than running netperf or iperf? > > Thanks, > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2g7NzquGC17Gz5dXHEOy7nQFGEhb7FrBPO0zrXDwH=d6g>