Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:19 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Subject: Re: Question about maintainers Message-ID: <200507281709.23125.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <C3B81AFDB8A5DFB5AB566CC4@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <F0C49818CB92DCFE4024C0D6@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 28. July 2005 16:43, Paul Schmehl wrote: > OK. I see that tcl (83,84), itcl, itk and iwidgets are all without > maintainers. Does that mean the ports are maintained by freebsd folks? = Or > not maintained at all? Not maintained at all. This is the charme of tcl/tk at work here, the black= =20 magic that it is makes nobody want to make a commitment to the stuff. :-) In the past, every once in a while somebody has submitted/committed an upda= te=20 here or there, but nobody ever picked up maintainership. You can check out= =20 who submitted/committed what in FreeBSD's cvsweb. However, tcl83/84, itk, itcl and iwidgets are a pretty broad base. You migh= t=20 want to get a clearer idea first where the problem is located before you go= =20 sending out questions to people. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6PUjXhc68WspdLARAjTtAKCTH/18Wjoad/yPu8NWxr35w6k0SgCgqFh+ 7LkyGq4geceq1nkz9sdTFjA= =TPpf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507281709.23125.lofi>