Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:52:18 +0300 From: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI encryption - CPU requirements? Message-ID: <cf9b1ee00905270752j334bede4od3e3b07eace5432a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5709ce310905270331t38952f66uf872a85b3e799596@mail.gmail.com> References: <cf9b1ee00905261637h248ae118i60068ab434e115be@mail.gmail.com> <gvj1de$jcr$1@ger.gmane.org> <5709ce310905270331t38952f66uf872a85b3e799596@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that GELI already defaults to AES-128. What documentation should I be looking into to see how different sector size options affect effective available disk space and performance? - Dan Naumov On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Alaksiej C <ac@belngo.info> wrote: > Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>: >> Except if you're really paranoid, you might want to relax your security >> requirements and use aes-128 without essentially reducing your practical >> security. > > > It's true. > > Also, sector size option (-s) could help you. Larger its value - > faster ciphering, for the price of less optimal disk space usage, of > course. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-geom@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-geom-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cf9b1ee00905270752j334bede4od3e3b07eace5432a>