Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:26:42 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de> To: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd inetd.c Message-ID: <19991117142642.A52979@internal> In-Reply-To: <199911170332.TAA55014@freefall.freebsd.org>; from peter@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 07:32:06PM -0800 References: <199911170332.TAA55014@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16-Nov-1999 at 19:32:06 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > peter 1999/11/16 19:32:06 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/inetd inetd.c > Log: > Put the listening socket into non-blocking mode before doing an > accept(2). This is a not really problem on -current as the accept race > is fixed, however it is a MFC candidate for -stable. > > This could possibly be slightly more efficient and leave the listening > socket permanently in non-blocking mode, but I wasn't certain that I > could catch all the stream/wait (not nowait) mode implications. What do people think about bringing the whole -current's inetd into -stable? I have done this on all of my 20 machines (mainly for the internal identd suppert) and I didn't experience any problems... -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991117142642.A52979>