Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:23:32 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDCan Toolchain Summit Summary Message-ID: <20100601162332.GA35104@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <86sk57nmfl.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20100531225732.GF31972@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <86sk57nmfl.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> writes: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/201005ToolchainSummitSummary > > "No new functionality that requires clang/llvm." > > How about "No new functionality with non-trivial incompatibilities with > clang/llvm"? That too. I'll add it to the real roadmap page once I create it. As long as people are willing to avoid the darker areas of gcc misfeatures that shouldn't be a problem in general, but I agree stating it as a target is a good idea. -- Brooks [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFMBTQEXY6L6fI4GtQRAnxnAJ9ZCsuIQ2B++yGh7qe6vOHiN5nnzACfbEdr IbEl7IGDjfNYcTip/OYmXLY= =DGje -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100601162332.GA35104>