Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:43:08 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r243328 - head/lib/libutil Message-ID: <20121120124307.GJ71195@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20121120122226.GA1828@a91-153-116-96.elisa-laajakaista.fi> References: <201211200722.qAK7M7Im057617@svn.freebsd.org> <20121120122226.GA1828@a91-153-116-96.elisa-laajakaista.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zYjDATHXTWnytHRU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>=20
> Hi!
>=20
> On 2012-11-20, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > change mode the group file to 0644 after a successfull rename(2)
> >=20
> > int
> > gr_mkdb(void)
> > {
> > - return (rename(tempname, group_file));
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret =3D rename(tempname, group_file);
> > +
> > + if (ret =3D=3D 0)
> > + chmod(group_file, 0644);
> > +
> > + return (ret);
> > }
>=20
> Rename+chmod is not an atomic operation. There is a window when the file
> has wrong permissions. Also, you don't check the return value of
> chmod(). Maybe chmod first and then rename?
>=20
> --=20
> Jaakko
Yes you are right chmod should probably be first.
regards,
Bapt
--zYjDATHXTWnytHRU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlCretsACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwBDACbB16OGN7Ldql22OLC7wibz7H9
ECsAoL21HP7HC4tBF6Dej6jQM5bInlMZ
=/UGf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--zYjDATHXTWnytHRU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121120124307.GJ71195>