Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:49:16 +1100
From:      Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: -pipe switch in kernel compilation
Message-ID:  <00Jan12.084918est.40333@border.alcanet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20000111130354.A10601@orion.ac.hmc.edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 07:58:12AM %2B1100
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000111133039.4135B-100000@calvin.saturn-tech.com> <200001112053.NAA06370@harmony.village.org> <20000111130354.A10601@orion.ac.hmc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2000-Jan-12 07:58:12 +1100, Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> wrote:
>I think that's why IBM has jumpers on some of their disks that limit
>them to 2GB.  I can't see why else you would want to take a perfectly
>good 8GB+ disk and use it as a 2GB drive.

The volumes probably mean it's not cost-effective to either continue
to produce smaller older technology drives, or design a new small
drive.

>  Of course, some of them may not even tolerate that much space.

AFAIK, the BIOS in my Toshiba T1850 won't allow anything bigger than
130MB.  Getting FreeBSD into my current 80MB isn't fun (and the major
reason it hasn't been updated from 2.2.5 - I can't cut 3.x down far
enough to fit, and -current is even larger).

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00Jan12.084918est.40333>